Which of the following is an example of using language to challenge sexism?

Using "human" instead of referring to gender is an effective way to challenge sexism because it promotes inclusivity and gender neutrality in language. This choice emphasizes the shared humanity of all individuals, regardless of gender, and helps to dismantle traditional gender binaries. By opting for non-gendered terms, it consciously avoids reinforcing stereotypes or biases that are often embedded in language. This approach fosters a more equitable discourse and encourages a culture that respects and values all people's contributions, irrespective of their gender.

In contrast, using "man" in all professional titles tends to reinforce traditional gender roles and suggests that male perspectives are the default or norm, which can perpetuate sexism in professional settings. Referring to women as "gals" in casual settings trivializes their presence and can be seen as diminishing their professional status or capabilities. Similarly, using male pronouns as a default undermines the visibility and acknowledgment of women and non-binary individuals, further entrenching gender biases in communication. Each of these alternatives fails to promote equitable language that challenges sexist attitudes.